Conservative Talk

"What is today a matter of academic speculation begins tomorrow to move armies and pull down empires."

-- J. Gresham Machen


Search This Site



Add to your Favorites


TheVanguard via Email!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Set Font Size

Default font size    Large font size    Massive font size

 
« Older Home
Loading Newer »
 

Family Law Reform: The Necessary Result of the Schiavo Debacle

Published by Rod D. Martin March 29th, 2005 filed under Jeb Bush, Family, Judiciary, End of Life, Rod D. Martin, Social Issues, TheVanguard.Org

Comments


Note: These comments are edited from an email exchange with several theologians.

I told a friend at some length today that I am getting very sick of “Reformed” people (if we may call them by such an increasingly inappropriate name) who never bother to show the sort of passion against those fighting against them that they reserve for those fighting with them. Jeb Bush, for instance, has been personally involved in fighting the Schiavo case — by every means at his disposal — for years: years, I might add, before the average Reformed loudmouth ever heard Terri Schiavo’s name. A few days ago, NewsMax was hailing Jeb as the “unsung hero” of this whole thing.

(continue reading post »)

On Terri Schiavo: Blaming Everyone But the Guilty

Published by Rod D. Martin March 29th, 2005 filed under George W. Bush, Conservatism, Jeb Bush, Christianity, Christian Activism, GOP, Judiciary, Rod D. Martin, Social Issues, GOP Record, End of Life, TheVanguard.Org

Comments

Letters we get letters (and indeed, one reason for starting this blog is to give outlet to some of the more interesting ones, items which would not really “fit” on the Vanguard site). Here, I respond to several common assertions regarding the Schiavo case which simply are not true or make no sense. My position is that we must blame the guilty — not the innocent — if we are to really make a difference after this case is (at this point, inevitably) over. The names have been changed to protect the privacy of my correspondents.

(continue reading post »)